Grand Theft Auto European City

Server Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: MAD_K!LL3R on March 14, 2018, 07:54:49 pm

Title: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: MAD_K!LL3R on March 14, 2018, 07:54:49 pm
http://ec.vc-mp.co.uk/index.php?topic=7495.0

so this is f1, right?  he showed his ping, right ? he provided whole video, right ?

ever heard about punch bug ? only spitfire's shots were'nt able to hit him i can see at the end of the video vito killed him not spitfire and the baba's knocking down shot was also from vito side not from siptfire, wrong ? isn't this coincidence ?

ask spitfire to provide whole video

one more thing "Ban Evasion/F1 usage"
Ban evasion ? he was banned ?
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: Aaron on March 14, 2018, 08:19:10 pm
Oops, it was a mistake, it should be death evasion not ban, anyways the ban will stand as long you comply the required proof of his innocence for me to lift his ban.
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: MAD_K!LL3R on March 14, 2018, 08:39:29 pm
Oops, it was a mistake, it should be death evasion not ban, anyways the ban will stand as long you comply the required proof of his innocence for me to lift his ban.
ban gives 0 fucks to him because he is on his army training plays a day after 2 weeks but it effects my eyes by watching wrong decision asking us to provide evidence why don't you get full evidence from reporter ?
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: Zkq on March 17, 2018, 06:48:05 am
Aaron, I am sure that the decision was taken very fast without a deep understanding the video.

Punch bug has exactly the same affect as a F1 user, but you didn't think about it I guess, like mad killer said, let @SpitFire show the full video if possible.


Clearly vito  knocked baba said down but in his screen, spitfire wasn't punch bugged so he tried to give him the kill as a gift, unfortunately spitfire didn't cause any damge so he thought he used F1.we see that Vito killed him after that, can this be F1?. No until he shows a full video.

I m just explaining that spitfire was punch bugged so he didn't damge baba and if you don't trust this, let spitfire show a full video, if he doesn't have, you may need to remove the ban for no enough evidences.

Thanks
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: Aaron on March 17, 2018, 01:12:16 pm
Requesting @SpitFire to post a full video of it, failed to do so is I will impose a warn for false reporting.
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: Broly on March 17, 2018, 01:59:18 pm
Requesting @SpitFire to post a full video of it, failed to do so is I will impose a warn for false reporting.
and what if he don't post,i Mean refused to provide video  ::)
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: DarK_WolF on March 17, 2018, 03:05:09 pm
Requesting @SpitFire to post a full video of it, failed to do so is I will impose a warn for false reporting.
and what if he don't post,i Mean refused to provide video  ::)
off course that means its a fake report, simple :>
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: MAD_K!LL3R on March 18, 2018, 03:01:40 pm
Requesting @SpitFire to post a full video of it, failed to do so is I will impose a warn for false reporting.
'according to this if he regret to provide full video baba will be un-banned, m i right?

@SpitFire
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: NeuTroN on March 19, 2018, 12:30:40 am
100% fake report its not f1  i thinks its ping  problem
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: NeuTroN on March 19, 2018, 12:34:16 am
they always post wrong reports .about MD
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: Aaron on March 19, 2018, 02:01:08 am
Giving a deadline of 1 day, failed to do so, actions will be taken as aforementioned.
Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: MAD_K!LL3R on March 20, 2018, 07:50:24 pm
Giving a deadline of 1 day, failed to do so, actions will be taken as aforementioned.
DeadLine over

Title: Re: Dafuq ? new drama!
Post by: Aaron on March 20, 2018, 08:00:28 pm
Upon given deadline that failed to submit given requirements, I will terminate [MD]Baba_Sain's ban but it doesn't mean he's off the line, I will still issue a warn for him for such inconstant ping and should be taken care of next time to avoid false report in such same case like this, and Spitfire will be warned as what I have already said if failed to comply.