Admin nick: Cool3
Your nick: =EK=Pavonis
Date: 17/10/20
Reason for report: False judgement and putting out some whole shitty different meaning of a line which i didn't even mean that way.
Evidence:(Screenshots, videos..etc) https://ec.vc-mp.net/index.php?topic=10834.0 , this report is a clear proof of his evading. But, hazard kept on uploading some nonsense videos which isn't even related to it. What does he mean by his "playstyle"? So, if someone reports me for evading with molotove i will just show a bunch of videos of me throwing molotove and thats it i cleared my way out? And about the lines cool3 said by pointing out my "So, you are comparing yourself to normal players now?" is just out of my ***** brain. I understand he maybe having issues irl, but then he should take a rest and let other proper admins handle it out. And the things he said like "what do you mean by he is not a normal player, he is a normal player too, what do you want from him, why showing hatred towards him, do you want him to commit suicide what do you want from him" etc. What are these bullshits? Is this what the staff's maturity? What i meant by saying "So, you are comparing yourself to normal players now?" is that if he is an admin he must be more experienced and aware of breaking such rules plus it isn't his first time doing evade. But, this guy pulled out a whole different story which literally gave me a .... sorry, i wont go showing disrespect to him. Mate, the lines you said was literally looking like you are some child who got provoked for no reason plus lines clears out like you are saving him and being biased also making him not apologize was more worst of you since that's what ruins the staff reputation. I wouldn't have even cared about it if hazard had apologized but no, instead he kept on showing useless videos and increased the dramas. I want
@Aaron or
@Human. to clear out a fair judgement. I don't want hazard to get punished / demoted i literally dont give a fuck about that but the thing that pissed me is that he never apologized for his mistake when the proof is crystal clear. That's it.
Extra notes: