Denied Cool3- Biased

[KILLERX]

Admin nick: Cool3
Your nick: KILLERX
Date: --
Reason for report: Biased
Evidence:(Screenshots, videos..etc)https://ec.vc-mp.net/index.php?topic=11198.0  and https://ec.vc-mp.net/index.php?topic=11234.0
Extra notes:Nothing against cool3 or anyone but just amazed, when i saw the evidence of both reports and one got accepted and one got rejected and in one report admin asked for explanation and in another report he just banned the player directly.

I am talking about no one else but cool3 and the only difference i noticed in reports that's the rejected report player was from MK and cool3 clan is in same clan and the accepted report player is unknown one for which cool3 didnt even bother to ask for explanation and directly banned him.

Edit: Just want to one more thing and its not a big problem at all but as far as i checked cool3 posts from profile and i noticed this guy was inactive and came back to work as soon as his clanmate got reported and thats also for rejecting the report.

Clearly he came for solving his clanmate report and i have no interest in getting Ibee banned but if ibee is innocent then the other guy is also innocent and should be unbanned as soon as possible but if he is not innocent then ibee should be banned aswell




Now the question which just raised in my mind: If ibee flicks were due to fast sens then why the other player flick is aimlock?

Thanks

[GerZ]

I think i'm allowed to post here since you used my report app,

So i'm hereby to add something to consider, cool3 was inactive on forum and wasn't dealing with any reports, how come out of the sudden he becomes active just to deny the report that is made against his clanmate Ibee? what are the odds of something as such happens lmao, it's clear that either Ibee called him to be active and deny the report, or he just saw it himself and that it's against his clanmate, then denied it,

and another case : https://ec.vc-mp.net/index.php?topic=11211.0  - in ronnie's report he asked for his explanation while the evidence is clear and still didn't ban him, While in  Sabio's report - https://ec.vc-mp.net/index.php?topic=11175.msg64117#msg64117 -   Cool3 banned him for the same thing without hearing any explanations,   The bias is unreal.


EDIT : To add to ibee's case  : https://viceunderdogs.com/index.php?topic=17449.0

Hunting mentioned a couple of stuff and proofs about MK/PL operating with spitfire to gain a couple of tools in which  he'll be an admin in their server in return, as you can see in the link i've posted.

[santiagoRK]

Banned.

[GerZ]

Unban that kid but next perma okno.
 gers gtfo no one cares what you think stupid

seems like a monkey has ran out of his cage in the zoo,  @Admins do your job

[Human.]

Denied, i dont see bias from cool3. Though, If you dont agree with his decision, you are free to ask them to post unban appeal.

Also make sure you are aware that the admins decision are not based on the report alone. If there are doubts, new player with new UID that joined and get reported for aimbot will more likely to get directly banned compared to old player that had played for years without any cheating record. The old player will likely get questioned and added to watchlist in this case. However, if the evidence is clear & the old player had record of similar rule break then he will likely get banned for longer time compared to new player.